Did Atlanta Happen to You? Click Here for a Free Case Evaluation
What is a settlement conference? It is a meeting scheduled specifically to negotiate a resolution of a lawsuit before it reaches trial, generally held once a case is far enough along that both sides understand its strengths and weaknesses.
It is often set by the court itself, sometimes with a judge or magistrate directly involved in pushing the discussion forward, rather than left entirely to the parties to arrange.
It shares a lot in common with mediation, but the two are not identical, and knowing the difference helps set realistic expectations for what the day will actually look like.
Mediation generally uses a private, neutral mediator chosen or agreed to by the parties, who has no independent authority over the case and cannot decide anything.
A settlement conference can be led the same way, but it is often scheduled directly by the court and can involve a judge or magistrate taking an active role in evaluating each side’s position, sometimes candidly.
Neither process results in a binding decision unless the parties actually agree — the difference lies mainly in who is running the room and how directive they are willing to be.
Each side generally presents its position, sometimes together and sometimes in separate rooms, with offers and counteroffers exchanged over the course of the session.
Where a judge or magistrate is involved, they may share a candid view of how the case looks from the bench, which can carry more weight with both sides than a private mediator’s opinion.
The conference can end in a full settlement, a partial resolution of some issues, or no agreement at all — in which case the case simply continues toward trial.
Going in with a clear understanding of the case’s actual value, supported by documented settlement figures rather than a number picked out of the air, generally leads to a more productive session.
Because offers can move quickly during the conference, having settlement authority worked out ahead of time, and knowing the realistic floor and ceiling, avoids losing momentum mid-negotiation.
Whether or not the case settles that day, the conference tends to sharpen both sides’ understanding of what a trial would actually involve.
It is a scheduled meeting, often set by the court, where both sides negotiate toward resolving the case before trial, sometimes with a judge or magistrate directly involved in the discussion.
Not exactly. Mediation generally uses a private neutral chosen by the parties, while a settlement conference is often court-scheduled and can involve a judge or magistrate taking a more active role.
The case simply continues toward trial. Nothing is forced to happen at a settlement conference unless both sides actually agree to resolve the case.
See how our attorneys fight for personal injury victims.
Our personal injury attorneys have spent 20+ years fighting for accident victims across Georgia. Your consultation is free, and you pay nothing unless we win.