Did Atlanta Happen to You? Click Here for a Free Case Evaluation
Criminal negligence goes well beyond an ordinary mistake. It describes conduct so careless — a conscious disregard of a serious, known risk — that the law treats it as criminal rather than merely a civil wrong.
This is a meaningfully higher standard than the everyday negligence that supports a personal injury claim, which only requires a failure to use reasonable care.
The two systems can, and often do, run side by side after the same incident, and one does not depend on the other reaching a particular result.
Ordinary civil negligence asks whether a person failed to act as a reasonably careful person would have — a low, everyday standard that covers most accidents.
Criminal negligence asks something tougher: did the person’s conduct show a reckless disregard for a substantial and unjustifiable risk of serious harm, the kind of carelessness a reasonable person would recognize as dangerous, not just careless.
Georgia’s civil courts also recognize gross negligence as an intermediate category — worse than ordinary carelessness but still a civil, not criminal, concept.
A driver who causes a crash while intoxicated may face criminal charges — vehicular homicide, serious injury by vehicle, or DUI — decided under the criminal standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
That same driver can separately be sued in a civil injury case, which only requires meeting the far lower preponderance of the evidence standard.
The two cases run independently. A pending or even unresolved criminal case does not have to conclude before a civil injury claim can move forward.
A criminal conviction can be powerful evidence in the related civil case, because a much higher standard of proof has already been satisfied.
Conversely, an acquittal or a decision not to prosecute does not end the civil claim — it simply means the civil case has to be proven on its own, under its own lower standard.
Conduct that reaches the level of criminal negligence can also support a request for punitive damages in the civil case, since it goes well beyond ordinary carelessness.
Criminal negligence requires a reckless disregard for a substantial, known risk of serious harm, proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Civil negligence only requires a failure to use reasonable care, proven by the much lower preponderance of the evidence standard.
It can help, since a conviction meets a higher standard of proof than the civil case requires. But a civil claim does not depend on any criminal charge existing, and can move forward with or without one.
Yes. A civil injury claim only requires showing it is more likely than not that the other driver was negligent, which does not require any criminal charge, conviction, or even an arrest.
See how our attorneys fight for personal injury victims.
Our personal injury attorneys have spent 20+ years fighting for accident victims across Georgia. Your consultation is free, and you pay nothing unless we win.